alex 0 Report post Posted January 26, 2007 hey everyone heres a fake u2 ad i did as a test http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseacti...eoid=1816510871 comment on what you think any improvements or tips on how to make this look even better would be great dont be to harsh but say what you think cheers alex Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brianodom 0 Report post Posted January 26, 2007 hey everyone heres a fake u2 ad i did as a test http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseacti...eoid=1816510871 comment on what you think any improvements or tips on how to make this look even better would be great dont be to harsh but say what you think cheers alex pretty nice man Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Sao_bento Report post Posted January 27, 2007 It's cool, but in todays world, it's hard to make something using only static sources and have it come across as anything other than low budget. The bad thing about the timing is that everyone's going to compare your work to the Jonas Odell video, also made only from stills. It would be good for you to look at yours and his side by side and contemplate the way they make their still-only footage go so much farther. The fact that it's still footage isn't something to camouflage, it's something to play with. Everyone knows it's a still image, so how can you acknowledge that and still make the video dynamic enough not to get boring? (IMHO, Odell did a good job, but, like U2's music, the video gets boring after awhile). http://stashmedia.tv/feed/Odell_U2.mov Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
palmer 0 Report post Posted February 1, 2007 I feel like a lot of the elements are animated the same exact way.... bouncy arc in front of the camera. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
